NIS2-Readiness

NIS2

NIS2 in Germany for international companies with a German entity

If an international company has an entity in Germany, the BSI (Federal Office for Information Security) is usually the competent authority for it, and the German BSI Act (BSIG) applies. Registration, reporting and supervision then take place in Germany, whatever applies in the group’s home country. Only for some digital entity types does the main establishment in the EU decide which authority is competent.

Meeting room on an upper floor at dusk, a folder, a laptop and a fountain pen on the table, a riverside city with a bridge outside

Last updated: 2026-11-06

This page is for companies headquartered outside Germany that have a subsidiary, branch or site here, and for the people responsible in the German entity. It shows what applies in Germany and where German procedures differ from a group policy written for every country at once. We make no statements about the law of other Member States; there, the national transposition of the NIS2 Directive (EU) 2022/2555 applies in each case.

Which law applies to the German entity?

The BSI Act (BSIG) as amended on 22 October 2026. Germany transposed the NIS2 Directive with the NIS2 Implementation Act; its Article 1 is the new BSIG, in force since 6 December 2025 with no general transition period. For the German entity, the German statutory text applies. A group policy built on the Directive or on the transposition in the home country has to be checked against it. The legal framework in detail is covered on the page on the NIS2 implementation act.

German law uses its own terms. This page speaks of essential entities (in Germany: besonders wichtige Einrichtungen; the German version of the Directive says wesentliche Einrichtungen) and important entities (wichtige Einrichtungen). If your group policy is in English, add the German terms next to the English ones so that registration and correspondence with the BSI match.

When is the BSI competent?

As a rule, as soon as the entity is established in Germany. Under Section 59 BSIG, the BSI is the competent supervisory authority for essential and important entities established in Germany and for operators of critical facilities located in Germany. The BSI sums it up: what matters is whether a company is established in Germany or has designated a representative here. According to the BSI, a company can therefore be covered even if it does not provide the relevant services in Germany.

Section 60 BSIG applies to a group of entity types: DNS service providers, top-level domain name registries, domain name registration service providers, cloud computing and data centre service providers, content delivery network providers, managed service providers, managed security service providers, and providers of online marketplaces, online search engines and social networking platforms. For them, the BSI is competent only if their main establishment in the EU is in Germany, but then for the whole EU.

CaseCompetentProvision
Entity established in Germany (general rule)BSI, for that entitySection 59 no. 1
Operator of critical facilities located in GermanyBSISection 59 no. 2
Section 60 entity type, main establishment in the EU in GermanyBSI, for the whole EUSection 60(1)
Section 60 entity type, main establishment in another Member Stateauthority of that Member State under its law (not the BSI)Section 60(1)
Section 60 entity type without an EU establishment, representative in GermanyBSISection 60(3)

The main establishment is the Member State where decisions on cyber security risk management measures are predominantly taken. If that cannot be determined or the decisions are taken outside the EU, it is the Member State where the cyber security measures are carried out, and failing that, the one with the establishment with the most employees in the EU (Section 60(2)). Designating a representative does not prevent legal action against the entity itself (Section 60(4)). If an entity of these types has no establishment in the EU but offers services in the EU, it must designate a representative in a Member State where it offers the services; if it has not designated one, the BSI may declare itself competent for it (Section 60(3)). The table simplifies: at the request of another Member State for mutual assistance, the BSI may also take action against an entity that offers services in Germany (Section 60(5)).

When is the BSI competent? Left, the general rule under Section 59 BSIG: the entity is established in Germany, the BSI is competent for that entity, except for entity types under Section 60, for which only the right-hand column applies; obligations in other Member States follow their law. Right, the entity types under Section 60 BSIG (DNS, TLD, domain name registration services, cloud, data centres, CDN, MSP, MSSP, online marketplaces, search engines, social networks): main establishment in the EU in Germany, then the BSI is competent EU-wide; main establishment in another Member State, then the authority there; no establishment in the EU, a representative; if it is in Germany, the BSI is competent. Bottom, what applies in Germany: ELSTER organisation certificate via Mein Unternehmenskonto, registration in the BSI portal, separately, in an incident, reporting to the joint reporting office of BSI and BBK, incident reports may be in English according to the BSI.
Tap the graphic to open it at full size.Competence of the BSI, simplified; check your individual case. Source: BSIG as amended on 22 October 2026, Sections 32, 33, 59, 60; BSI, general NIS‑2 FAQ; own illustration.

Does registration in the home country cover Germany?

No, except for the Section 60 entity types. Asked whether international companies can register and report centrally with the BSI for all Member States, the BSI answers: for Section 60 entities this can be the case, otherwise not. Obligations under the national transpositions apply independently of each other; registration duties have to be met in several countries if their laws require it. Conversely, registering with the BSI does not replace a registration that another Member State requires.

For group planning, this means: every entity that is essential or important in a Member State needs its own route there. There is no central group registration for the German subsidiary. If a parent and a subsidiary with shared IT each belong to a covered entity type and together reach the thresholds, both are covered according to the BSI; it is then not enough for only the parent to meet the requirements.

How does the German entity register?

In two stages, like every entity in Germany: first an ELSTER organisation certificate via “Mein Unternehmenskonto” (MUK, the German government’s business account), then registration in the BSI portal. The deadline is three months after the entity first or again qualifies as essential or important (Section 33(1)). For entities already in scope on 6 December 2025 it has passed; the BSI asks them to register without delay. Steps, required details and a completed checklist are on the page on NIS2 registration.

For international groups, three points differ from what many expect:

  • Tax number: MUK requires a German tax number. A German GmbH normally has one. According to the BSI, entities without a German tax number can apply to the Neubrandenburg tax office (RAB) for an identifier in the form of a tax number; when registering in “Mein ELSTER”, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern must then be selected as the federal state. The identifier triggers no tax or levy checks.
  • One profile per entity: each NIS‑2-relevant entity needs its own MUK profile. Access held by the parent company is not enough for the subsidiary.
  • Member States and IP addresses: you list the Member States in which the entity carries out the core activity that leads to its classification; maintenance or customer service do not count, according to the BSI. Public static IP ranges of foreign subsidiaries may be reported as well, the BSI says. Entities registering under Section 34 list the ranges of the main establishment and of the other EU establishments.

Where, and in which language, are incidents reported?

Significant security incidents are reported to the joint reporting office of the BSI and the Federal Office of Civil Protection and Disaster Assistance (BBK): an early warning no later than 24 hours after becoming aware, an incident notification with an initial assessment no later than 72 hours, and a final report no later than one month after that (Section 32(1)). Reports go through the BSI portal; entities not yet registered report via an online form in the BSI’s reporting and information portal, according to the BSI. The reporting process is described on the page on NIS2 incident reporting.

On language, the BSI states explicitly: incident reports may be submitted in English. Otherwise, Section 23 of the German Administrative Procedure Act (VwVfG) applies to administrative procedures: the official language is German, and for applications or documents in a foreign language the authority should request a translation. For registration, requests for information and supervisory measures, we therefore recommend naming a person in the German entity who can handle correspondence in German.

If an incident has effects in several Member States, the BSI must be informed without undue delay where it is competent. Whether further reporting obligations exist in other countries is for the company to check; according to the BSI, a report to the BSI does not automatically meet them.

What does this mean for group IT and management?

  • Size including the group: partner and linked enterprises count towards the classification, according to the BSI also those outside Germany and the EU. Only if the entity is independent of the group in its IT do its own figures alone count (Section 28(4)). How to check and document this is shown in the applicability check.
  • Measures apply to the entity: the German entity must take the risk management measures under Section 30 BSIG. If group IT runs its systems, the entity must be able to show that the measures are implemented there; the measures in detail are on the page on Section 30 BSIG.
  • Reporting by third parties: service providers, including group IT, can be authorised to report; responsibility for the incident and the content stays with the entity. For the start of the deadlines, the BSI refers to the moment an employee of the entity becomes aware of the incident (during working hours).
  • Management of the German entity: Section 38 BSIG obliges the management body of the entity to implement the measures, oversee their implementation and attend training regularly. That means the managing directors of the German entity. Their duties are explained on the page on NIS2 and management.

Example: checklist for a German group subsidiary

Fictitious example, not a client. A group headquartered in the United States makes measuring equipment. It includes a German GmbH that develops and manufactures measuring instruments (NACE division 26, 140 employees in annual work units) and a sales company in the Netherlands. The GmbH’s IT is run by the group data centre in the United States, and a group security team monitors all sites. The GmbH’s completed checklist looks like this:

No.CheckResult for the GmbHProvision
1Classification with group figuresAnnex 2 no. 5.2.1 (manufacture of computer, electronic and optical products); IT not independent, group figures count; result: important entitySection 28(2) no. 3, (4)
2Competent authorityBSI, because the GmbH is established in Germany; not a Section 60 entity typeSection 59 no. 1
3Other group companiesDutch sales company to be checked separately under Dutch law; not part of this checklistBSI FAQ, registration no. 7
4Access to MUKGerman tax number available; ELSTER organisation certificate held by accounting, access for the information security officer agreed in writingBSI, registration
5Registration in the BSI portalMember States of the core activity: Germany; maintenance visits to customers in Austria not listedSection 33(1) no. 4; BSI FAQ, registration no. 12
6NIS‑2 contact pointshared mailbox of the GmbH, two contact persons in Germany with deputiesBSI registration guide
7Reporting chaingroup security team informs the GmbH’s contact point immediately of incidents affecting its systems; the GmbH decides on the report; group authorised to report on its behalf, responsibility stays with the GmbHSection 32(1); BSI on reporting
8Languageincident reports may be in English; registration and correspondence handled in German by the information security officerBSI FAQ, registration no. 15; Section 23 VwVfG
9Measures under Section 30evidence from the group data centre for the GmbH’s systems agreed by contract (reports on updates, backup, access)Section 30(1), (2)
10Managementboth managing directors of the GmbH: oversee implementation, training, quarterly report to them, not only to the groupSection 38(1), (3)
11Reviewannually after the accounts are approved and after restructuring in the groupown rule

The checklist is a working aid. Mapping the entity type, the group calculation and whether a representative is needed belong with a lawyer in the individual case.

Three typical gaps in group subsidiaries

GapCauseEffectRemedy
German entity not registeredassumption that the parent’s registration in its home country covers the whole groupregistration duty under Section 33 not met, the BSI does not know the entityclassification per entity, registration of the German entity in the BSI portal with its own MUK profile
Reporting deadline runs before Germany knowsincidents land with the group security team without a fixed route to the German entityearly warning within 24 hours at riskreporting chain with triggers, German contact point reachable outside business hours, authorisation to report on the entity’s behalf
Subsidiary’s management not involvedsecurity is only discussed in group committeesthe managing directors cannot show implementation and oversight under Section 38regular report to the German entity’s management, their own training, decisions documented

Gaps and remedies are our own professional assessment. Whether your German entity meets the requirements of Section 30 BSIG today is shown by the NIS2 gap analysis, which we carry out in German or English.

Frequently asked questions

Is it enough for the parent company to register in its home country?+
No, except for the Section 60 entity types with their main establishment in Germany. According to the BSI, the obligations under the national transpositions apply independently. If the German entity is an essential or important entity, it registers with the BSI itself.
Can an entity without a German tax number register?+
Yes. According to the BSI, it can apply to the Neubrandenburg tax office (RAB) for an identifier in the form of a tax number and then use “Mein Unternehmenskonto”. Each entity needs its own profile.
May we report incidents in English?+
Yes, the BSI explicitly allows incident reports in English. German remains the official language in administrative procedures (Section 23 VwVfG); for registration and correspondence we therefore recommend a contact person who can work in German.
Our cloud subsidiary is in another Member State. Is the BSI competent?+
For cloud computing service providers and the other Section 60 entity types, the BSI is competent only if the main establishment in the EU is in Germany. If it is in another Member State, that state’s authority is competent. The main establishment is where decisions on cyber security risk management are predominantly taken.
Who is the management body under Section 38 BSIG in a German subsidiary?+
Section 38 BSIG addresses the management body of the entity. If the entity is the German GmbH, that means its managing directors. They must oversee implementation of the measures and attend training regularly, even if group IT runs the systems.

Read more

Sources

This content provides general technical and organisational information and does not constitute legal advice (no legal services within the meaning of the German RDG).